Bird on the horizon
Sittin’ on a fence
He’s singin’ his song
for me
At his own expense . .
.
—”You’re a Big Girl
Now”
Bob Dylan and I happen
to be the same age. I have seen him live in concert only three times, once in 1960
at Gerde’s Folk City in Greenwich Village, when he was just starting out, then
44 years later, in 2004, at a minor league baseball field in Brockton, MA.,
playing the second half on a bill with Willy Nelson, then, a few years after
that, once more, at a rather rote excessively amplified concert in Essex,
Vermont.
Before a reading in
Manhattan, Wallace Stevens remarked to John Malcolm Brinnin, “on occasions like
this, the voice is the actor.” (Stevens went on to “perform” his poetry that
evening in an almost inaudible monotone.) Robbie Robertson of the Band said
that Bob Dylan’s voice was an actor capable of playing many parts. Dylan, the
improbable heir not only of Whitman and Hart Crane, but of Eliot and Frost as
well, lives up to the billing. His voice has been an actor of Homeric scope.
A
typical put-down of Dylan is that he never could sing (it is undeniable that his voice has lost much of its plangency in old age), but this is an abject failure to
connect with his achievement. Frank Sinatra, a great singer whom Dylan admired,
is nonetheless always Frank Sinatra through all his singing, more or less as
Jack Nicholson is always Jack Nicholson no matter whom he is playing.
Dylan
on the other hand, as Robertson said, has invented a diverse series of
personae, characters whose unique styles match up with whatever he happens to
be singing. Robert Frost evolved a theory and practice of poetry he called “the
sound of sense,” where he played off tones of voice, the way people actually
sound as they speak in ordinary conversation, against the strictures of
traditional verse forms and beats, to create something fresh (“Some have relied on what they knew/Others on being
simply true/What worked for them might work for you”). This is exactly what Dylan
has done through hundreds of songs, from the caustic “What Was It You Wanted?”
to the sensual “I’ll Be Your Baby Tonight,” to the prophetic “You got to Serve
Somebody,” to the poignant “You’re a Big Girl Now” or “Stayed in Mississippi a
Day Too Long.” Individual performances of songs provide further elaboration and
change. There is the Warholian “Visions of Joanna” on “Blonde on Blonde,” and
the “Visions of Joanna” sung and played with tremendous joy (though Dylan has
on his usual deadpan face as he tosses off this utter masterpiece of a
performance) in Portsmouth England in a 2000 concert available on YouTube.
Dylan
has achieved an infinitely more versatile set of performances than
Sinatra. Dylan’s accomplishment is
all the more remarkable because it consists of a unique mix of the poetry of his
own words, the poetry of melody, the poetry of instrumentation, and the poetry
of the voice in individual performance. These cannot be separated. In vocal/instrumental
music the combinations of melodic, rhythmic and spoken cadences breaking across
each other are almost infinitely variable.
That’s the biggest problem with any academic approach to Dylan: his poetry isn’t the half of it, or maybe even a third of it. The three halves together—that fateful congruence of poetry, specific voicing and the way verse and voice play off against their instrumental and rhythmic context—will always partly elude the scholars, even the most brilliant, like Christopher Ricks or Sean Wilentz. Dylan is irreducible and incommensurable. Dylan and the academy have always been oil and water. I happened to be in the audience when Princeton University presented him with an honorary doctorate, an occasion that inspired his song “Day of the Locust.” He couldn’t have looked more uncomfortable sitting onstage in his black cap and gown in the 90-degree heat, sweating along with the Secretary General of the U.N. and other more conventional notables. Decades later, appearing in the film “Masked and Anonymous,” he still looks uncomfortable—except when playing and singing.
That’s the biggest problem with any academic approach to Dylan: his poetry isn’t the half of it, or maybe even a third of it. The three halves together—that fateful congruence of poetry, specific voicing and the way verse and voice play off against their instrumental and rhythmic context—will always partly elude the scholars, even the most brilliant, like Christopher Ricks or Sean Wilentz. Dylan is irreducible and incommensurable. Dylan and the academy have always been oil and water. I happened to be in the audience when Princeton University presented him with an honorary doctorate, an occasion that inspired his song “Day of the Locust.” He couldn’t have looked more uncomfortable sitting onstage in his black cap and gown in the 90-degree heat, sweating along with the Secretary General of the U.N. and other more conventional notables. Decades later, appearing in the film “Masked and Anonymous,” he still looks uncomfortable—except when playing and singing.
Unlike someone like
Marlon Brando, who made acting more authentic in the same way Dylan renews
stale musical conventions, Dylan has not fallen into the temptation of holding
his chosen medium in contempt. Instead, even though it hasn’t always been jolly
to have to inhabit his own myth, he has expanded and reinvented song as
endlessly and prolifically as Picasso reinvented painting. He takes risks
exploring human depths that other artists wouldn’t even contemplate. A
song like “Disease of Conceit,” (Oh Mercy) with its seemingly lame idea and
lamer rhymes, shouldn’t even get off the ground, but it ends up flying more
than gracefully. And for every near pratfall there are literally hundreds of
songs that are works of genius—“What Good Am I?,” “Most of the Time,” (both on
Oh Mercy), “Sugar Babe.” (Love and Theft)
Further
versatility and depth is provided by the way Dylan is one of the few who has
continued to write songs in the authentic voice of a man in his teens,
twenties, thirties, forties, fifties, sixties. It is silly to
assert that Dylan let down
1960’s radicalism by abdicating themes of protest—because he never abdicated. He has
gone on writing trenchant critiques of various kinds, “We Live in a Political
World,” “Workingman’s Blues,” “Its All Good,” and on and on. The adolescent outrage and wry cynicism by which he first became known
makes up only a small section of his Protean range of voices and poetic
stances, including the poetry of the householder, the poetry of the despairing
and alienated loner, of the sly indirect commentator on crime, corruption,
violence and world catastrophe, and the poetry too of love and affirmation of
human and divine goodness.
At one point Dylan was
even nominated for the Nobel, and why not? As a poet Dylan deserves and would himself give
added prestige to the Nobel, except that the prize is not given for the ancient
bardic enhancement of poetry by music. Neither Frost nor Stevens ever did get the Nobel,
but should have. So should Dylan, though it may be the last thing he wants—or
needs.
At Campanelli Stadium
in Brockton, we were able to stand right in front of the stage, about fifty
feet away from Dylan and his band. An announcer broadcast a hyped
commercial-sounding message about how Dylan was thought of as a has-been but
kept bouncing back—as if this mythological character needed the slightest justification.
Dylan played only
keyboard throughout his entire set, standing with bent legs in his black suit
and white cowboy hat. You could see the sweat flying off his face. He ran
through “High Water Rising,” “Poor Boy,” the rollicking “Summer Nights,” “Highway
61 Revisited,” and other classics. After every number the lights went down and
he wandered off into the back of the stage—to tipple? At the end, he faced the crowd, swaying back and forth, an unexpectedly slight medium for so much song over so much time. Slowly he raised his left thumb and smiled slightly. Still standing.
No comments:
Post a Comment